Imelda Tierney
Partner, Galway Office
Imelda is a Partner, practising as part of the Healthcare Litigation team. She advises clients on all forms of legal disputes with a current particular emphasis on medical malpractice actions on behalf of hospitals and healthcare professionals including regularly acting as the advocate for clinicians and hospitals at Inquests. Imelda has advised clients on all aspects of healthcare provision both contentious and non-contentious and was previously a member of a hospital ethics committee.
She has represented both plaintiffs and defendants in all courts including the commercial division of the High Court and frequently acts in the defence of high value and sensitive clinical negligence claims.
Imelda is a CEDR accredited mediator and is a strong advocate of alternative dispute resolution. Imelda encourages clients to engage in the mediation process where appropriate and she frequently represents both healthcare and non-healthcare clients in mediation.
Education
National University of Ireland Galway (BA) (LLB)
University College Dublin (Postgraduate Diploma in Equality Studies)
Professional
Admitted as a solicitor in Ireland. Accredited mediator (CEDR).
Accolades
Imelda has been recognised by Chambers Europe and The Legal 500 for her work in Healthcare Law.
Practice Areas
Sectors
Imelda Tierney is a really fantastic lawyer.– Chambers Europe (2024)
Imelda Tierney is an excellent advocate and is a great support to clients when attending court. Has exceptional interpersonal communication skills, is very well organised and is highly respected.– The Legal 500 (2023)
Imelda Tierney has the ability of uncomplicating the complex. Her case management skills have yet to be equalled. Her attention to detail and mastery of the issues are excellent– Chambers Europe (2023)
Related Content
Settlement of Civil Disputes: Overview (Ireland)
Charlene Walsh and Hilda Mannix from RDJ's Dispute Resolution team consider the key aspects of settling civil disputes in Ireland in this Practical Law Insight. In particular,...
Reputation matters: High Court dismisses defamation claim over untrue article where no damage caused to plaintiff’s reputation
The reputation of most complainants in defamation cases is a given. It is unusual for a Court in defamation proceedings to find that a newspaper article that is untrue was not...
Does a Duty of Care exist as between healthcare providers and a relative of a patient in a nervous shock claim?
A recent high court decision of Carmel Germaine v Mary Day [2024] IEHC 420 has provided clarity on the criteria and considerations relevant to nervous shock claims in the cont...
Court of Appeal clarifies law on qualified privilege defence in defamation claims arising from mass media publications
In this Insight Darryl Broderick and Conor Beck from RDJ’s Media Team look at the law surrounding the defence of qualified privilege and how this defence can be relied upon in...
The decision and effects of the Supreme Court decision in Delaney v. PIAB & Ors.
In this article, Louise Smith, Partner in RDJ’s Litigation and Dispute Resolution Team discusses the Supreme Court decision published yesterday in the case of Delaney v. PIAB ...
Another case of “Don’t Look Up”? – 13-year-old proceedings dismissed for delay
In this article, Hilda Mannix and Steven Scanlan from RDJ’s Dispute Resolution team discuss the recent decision of Mr. Justice Rory Mulcahy in Coughlan & Anor v. Stokes &a...